Another interesting article on Panda
  • Mutiny92Mutiny92 May 2011

    I hope you don't mind me posting these.  I find it fascinating what people are speculating about Panda.  Based on what I see so far, it makes me think that either sites need to be more targeted to specific niches or must have extremely robust editorial review - which would price a lot of folks out of the game.

    The large sites that can afford their own internal content (like a CNN) will fair better than UGC sites.
  • RookRook May 2011
    I actually appreciate your posting these panda articles. I'm particularly worried about persistent reports of scraped content ranking higher than the original source material. I can deal with the rest of what appears to be G's agenda as far as "quality" is concerned, but the scraped content anecdotes are troubling.

    Thanks for sharing this.
    Don't surround yourself with yourself; move on back two squares.
  • tonyleantonylean May 2011

    Yet another, discussing the possibility of "bounce" being part of the Google Algo....
    Want to retire in the Philippines and relax?? Give me a call.. lol
    Leanman on Hubpages
  • What would be considered an acceptable bounce rate? I've never really got it below 80%, maybe 75%, on a personal site. This is a conundrum though, a site with the perfect ad optimization is going to see a higher bounce rate as a result. I can see people splitting up articles into several pages, 350 words per page (like Helium) if this turns out to play a significant role, that is one guaranteed way to lower your bounce rate.
  • Digging the Gravatar, nice touch.